The suggested gaming establishment venture in the nation of Papua New Guinea has sparked significant debate, with diverse factions expressing their disapproval. The substantial financial agreement, currently in its initial phases, is a component of the broader and similarly disputed Paga Hill undertaking in the capital city of Port Moresby. This new gambling venue will cater solely to international visitors, excluding local residents.
Spearheading the resistance against the initiative are proponents of psychological well-being and religious institutions. Dr. Uma Ambi, a prominent mental health specialist within the nation, cautions about the risks linked to wagering. “We must remain cognizant that obsessive and unhealthy gambling is correlated with health complications,” she elaborates. “This stems from the fact that some of these gaming pursuits extend late into the night, depriving individuals of rest, which consequently impacts their professional lives.” She proceeds to emphasize the all-encompassing character of gambling, stating that “it influences their focus, their tenacity, their emotional states, and results in despondency and other mental health concerns – both significant and minor.”
Conversely, Clemens Kanau, the head of the National Gaming Control Board, contends that these apprehensions are irrelevant. He postulates that since the gaming establishment is intended for overseas visitors, local inhabitants will remain unaffected. He further underscores the financial advantages, particularly the generation of employment opportunities. “I am of the opinion that the merits are substantial,” Kanau asserts. “If and when the casino commences operations, we anticipate a rise in employment, which is a pressing matter within the nation – we grapple with a high unemployment rate.”
Anticipated a significant surge in the employment statistics.
